Categories
Editorial Photographic Pictorial

on the set: not alone

NOT_0621.JPG
Not Alone writer & director, Tristan Versluis
I first met Tristan Versluis (pictured left) about 2 years ago when I answered a crew-call ad placed in Shooting People for a focus puller. Obviously I’m no focus puller, but I’d been bitten by the unit stills bug doing a few freebies on shorts for friends of friends and was looking for something new to shoot. The ad in question had been placed by Stuart White, the director of photography on Tristan’s short Pixel (2007), and I replied to ask if they needed any production stills on the same expenses-only basis that most short film crews agree to. They did, I signed up, and I ended up shooting not only the production shots but also all the effect and texture reference shots for the CG artists.

Since then Tristan has completed two other shorts, I Love You (2008) and Questions (2009), the former of which I was able to work on as well. If there’s one thing in common with all of these, it’s Tristan’s preferred flavour of gruesome prosthetics effects, unsurprising considering his career as a prosthetics designer on the likes of Hot Fuzz (2007), Sweeney Todd (2007) and Prince Caspian (2008). He’s earned himself the affectionate nickname “Doctor Versluis” amongst friends and actors because of his gentle, methodical ‘bedside manner’ working with actors during the long and tiring process of applying the prosthetics, and he brings the same calming focus to the directorial chair, making it a pleasure to work with him.

For his first feature (self-written, like his shorts) he’s teamed up with Andy Thompson from Dead On Arrival Digital in the producing chair, the writer and director behind The Scar Crow. He’s also made sure to bring along practically all the key crew from his shorts, including Stuart White as Director of Photography, Melanie Light as Production Designer, Tiernan Hanby as 1st AD and Trevor Speed pulling focus, so it felt more like a reunion than a weekend of work.

The movie is called Not Alone and while you can get the full sell on their official website, the story basically follows a troubled young woman (Lucy Benjamin) in 1958 America seeking an escape from haunting memories of a gruesome massacre, and finding completely the opposite at an old cabin out by the coast. Needless to say, it doesn’t go at all well and there’s a lot of blood.

Reading the script I had to wonder if Tristan was deliberately making his life difficult shooting in the UK to recreate 1950’s West Coast USA but on arriving at the location (left) I was extremely impressed with the set. They’ve managed to find and secure an absolutely perfect existing cabin on the Norfolk coast, eerily isolated among windswept fields just yards from a ragged coastline, as well as a pair of beautiful genuine 1950s American vehicles, a Dodge and a Chevrolet, which absolutely sell the setting. Mel Light told me that in just the first few days it was already one of the best-looking productions she’d worked on and peeking at the monitor during takes I’m very excited about seeing the finished film.

Categories
Editorial Photographic

ten great photography blogs

logo.gifI’ve tried to cut down on the amount of stat-checking since my crisis of confidence a couple of months ago, but I do still sneak a look more often than I should, and I keep seeing links from a site called Blogtrepreneur. I’ve always assumed it was just one of those photoblog aggregate sites like VFXY or photoblogs.org.

Anyway I actually clicked the link today and it turns out that in February the guys at Blogtrepreneur listed me in an article entitled Ten Great Photography Blogs, along with some of my own favourites. Here’s what they had to say about my glass eye:

A unique portfolio with portraits, stills and editorial shots that express the unique viewpoint of the artist; one that captures real world images in stark honesty.

… which is nice! Thanks, guys.

Categories
Photographic

1 day is coming

1DA_0501.JPGIn August 2008 I spent a couple of days in Birmingham shooting stills on a new film by Penny Woolcock called 1 Day. I’ve not been able to really talk about the film until now, but they’ve started their publicity drive so some of my shots are in the public domain at last. It tells the tale of a young man called Flash who is caught up in the so-called Postcode Wars in Birmngham – gangs that rule very clearly defined areas of the city – and his struggle to avoid getting shot to pieces by two particular gangs over the course of 24 hours.

Most excitingly, the film features several musical numbers, all rap written and performed by the actors themselves. It’s out in the cinemas sometime this year and has a website featuring several trailers and one of the songs, at 1daythemovie.co.uk.

Here’s the official blurb:

Flash (Duffus) wakes up to a phone call from Angel (Watson) announcing that he’s being released from prison and wants the £500K he’d left with Flash for safekeeping. Short of the full amount and pushed for time, Flash is forced to strike a deal with Evil (Duncan) who more than lives up to his name. 1 DAY follows Flash’s race against the clock as he’s pursued by a rival gang, the police, his three irate babymothers and his granny.

1DA_1444.JPG1DA_0432.JPG

Categories
How-Tos Photography how-tos

you have to start somewhere

BOY_0038.JPGI’m on another short film doing stills this weekend – another freebie but I’m fortunate enough to have another stream of income right now so I can afford to do a few freebies for friends. It’s a great source of experience and gets me some more shots for the portfolio. Plus, in the past these projects have allowed me to meet other professionals who then take me onto paid work with them. This post is about what happens when I get to the first day on a new production, and specifically the first 10 shots (or thereabouts) I take to get me going.

This film is called The Golden Boy and the man calling in the favour is Danny Bishop (operating the camera on the left here), a talented camera operator with whom I worked on Reuniting The Rubins earlier this year. He’s the sort of man who inspires total confidence and trust so it’s a pleasure to work with him, and indeed at least half the crew on this short came from Rubins.

It’s a 3-day shoot, working overnight from dusk till dawn on the streets of London. On day one a lot of people will be seeing new faces, although there’ll also be a lot of people who have worked together in the past. Within each department people will generally know each other already, as that’s how everyone gets work – they’re hired by someone they’ve worked for before who liked them.

The the first thing I try to do is introduce myself to the 1st Assistant Director, the 2nd if they’re around (they’re usually back at the unit base), and any of the 3rds I can find. The 1st is running the set while the director works with the creative aspects, and on occasion I might not be able to get the shot I need due to camera position. In those cases it’s the 1st that will be able to get a scene run again just for me, so it’s essential to have a good relationship with him or her. I’ll say hi and let them know my name, find out if there’s anything I need to know already, shoot the breeze for a couple of minutes if there’s time, and then let them get on with their extremely busy job.

Then I find the camera crew and say hello to them when I get a chance, although the conversation is generally a lot shorter because they’ll be focussing very intently on their own roles tending to the camera, especially on the first day when everyone is making sure that the first shot goes off without a hitch. I’m going to be hovering very close to them a lot of the time and I need them on my side so I make a very good point of remembering names (which I’m pretty awful at these days!) and then finding somewhere safe to hide while they’re running back and forth with lenses and cables and tape measures and actors marks.

Now I get my camera set up, once I’m comfortable that people in my immediate vicinity know to expect a stills camera pointed at the action. Got to start somewhere so I’ll either make an educated guess at the settings and fire a shot off, or I’ll just fire one off with whatever I’ve already got programmed in and go from there. I’ll almost always shoot manual settings on a film because the lighting is set up to remain constant.

Here’s my first shot. It’s shot on aperture priority as that’s what my camera was on when I pulled it out the bag:

BOY_0010.JPG
ISO 1600, f/5.6, 1/160, Cloudy

Way underexposed! The bright light in the middle is set up down the street pointing back at the actors for both fill and backlight, depending on where the actors are standing. It’s firing straight into my lens, and so aperture priority mode has screwed up his eyes and wailed “Too bright!” and produced a fast shutter. Next shot I switch to Manual mode and slow down the shutter.

BOY_0011.JPG
ISO 1600, f/5.6 1/50, Cloudy

The shutter is now dragging too long really. At 1/50 I’ll never get frozen motion, and probably lots of camera shake, and it’s still underexposed. I’m going to have to put the ISO up past 1600 – good thing I’ve got a D700, eh? Those boards have been laid down to smooth the track on that the camera will make on the dolly (the wheeled trolley it’s attached to). Usually dolly tracks will be used, which the grooved wheels ride on, but it’s possible there wasn’t enough budget for them on this short.

BOY_0013.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/25, Sunny

Much more light getting in now. Why did I make the shutter even slower? I’m not sure. Bit daft, really. By the way, the stand on the right is supporting the main light for this location. I’m not great with the names of lights. Let’s just say it’s a big one, and it’s got a huge softbox over it, probably about 5 feet square.

I can see that the white balance is going to have to change, probably to Tungsten, and I can now afford to pull the shutter back to something much more reasonable. Shutter first:

BOY_0015.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/60, Sunny

That’s better. Way too warm, and still a bit bright really. 1/60 is about as slow as I’ll go on a film if a scene is relatively static and I absolutely need the light, but is still useless for freezing motion enough for my needs.

Time to switch the white balance:

BOY_0017.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/125, Incandescent (Tungsten)

Now we’re pretty much there. Good shutter speed, good white balance. Feels a little cold – even though I’m shooting RAW so I can tweak it all later if I have to, I’d rather get it as close as dammit right now so I don’t have to faff around later. I know that’s the luxury of RAW, but I think you can get bogged down in that and I’ll cheerfully argue the point with those that criticise not taking advantage of the post-processing freedom RAW gives you. Get it right in the camera and I can spend more time on the couch at home.

Next shot I try what I perhaps should have done in the first place – I try Auto White Balance:

BOY_0018.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/125, Auto WB

See, the camera thought tungsten all along. But just that tiny bit warmer, and you know I agree. However, I’m not given to trusting living in Auto settings for film stills because they can change from shot to shot given what’s in the frame, and I need consistency over a long period, so I go back to Tungsten and warm it up in-camera.

BOY_0019.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/125, Tungsten A5

Tungsten A5 refers to the D700’s warmer/cooler tweaks for white balance. Cooler is B1-5. It looks good to my eye and if it’s not right later, I can still always tweak. I think it’s good. So I grab a wider shot to check once more:

BOY_0021.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/125, Tungsten A5

It’s perhaps a bit bright – films are almost always underexposed compared to what a stills camera says is a good exposure, but I’ll wait till the actors are in the shot to see how the light plays on them. One last shot, decently framed at last!

BOY_0023.JPG
ISO 2500, f/2.8, 1/125, Tungsten A5

And now I’m ready to go! Over the course of the next two hours my settings rarely changed, except I did go up to ISO 3200 and had to move my shutter speed around from 1/80 to 1/160 depending on where the actors were. They moved around the corner of the wall and it was a lot darker on the other side, plus I felt some my shots were a bit bright overall so will bring them down around half a stop in Capture NX2 today.

Hope this was interesting reading to someone – you’ve got to start somewhere and sometimes it’s to shoot full auto and tweak those settings if they’re pretty good, other times I just work it one setting at a time, putting the ISO up only when I’m dipping into slow shutter territory.

I’ll post a few shots from the shoot once I’ve finished on it – I’m back there on Sunday night. Thanks for reading!

Categories
Editorial Photographic Pictorial

back in the saddle

I’ve just got back from 12 days in Alabama and Florida (mostly the former) with my other half, and we managed to shake off the jetlag pretty much by staying up from 8am Florida time Friday morning, to 10pm UK time Saturday night. Sleeping on the plane didn’t happen – crappy flights, don’t ask – but daylight and plenty of coffee at the other end did. We did have some great times over there visiting family and friends, but it was also good to get back. There’s something about American food I just can’t get used to…

Then on Sunday I went over to Le Gothique in Clapham where my friend Ryan Haysom was shooting a new short called Fragments. Just a freebie, really small crew (there were 3 of us, and 3 actors), using available light for everything. I got some great moments down but I’ll save the plot stuff for Ryan to reveal when he’s ready.

For now here’s a few completely spoiler free portraits I grabbed both in and out of the action, all pretty much straight out the camera bar a couple of cosmetic tweaks.

FRG_0075.JPGHiram Bleetman

FRG_0216.JPGFRG_0306.JPG
left to right: Sean Turner; Hiram Bleetman

frg-0521.jpgleft to right: Hiram Bleetman, Ryan Haysom, Hannah Douglas

The light on that first one I really like, the way there appears to be various differently lit layers – the brighter background, the sharper but darker foreground with some kick, and the sort of frontal rim around Hiram’s face and jacket. It’s just the sun, filtering through trees at coincidentally exactly the right moment as he was walking towards the camera, which is literally one pixel outside the left of the frame. I was running alongside at a distance to stay out of shot and this was the only frame possible that kept out the cameraman (Ryan), but I do really like shots like this where the looking room is the wrong side and the tree on the right really sold it to me. Only really noticed the lighting aspect later when checking the LCD.

While I was State-side I’d taken my 18-200mm DX lens. It’s not the sharpest pencil in the box, nor lens in the bag, and has to employ the DX cropping mode of the D700 sensor. Decided to embrace these and got some great photos by not being too precious for a change, doing B&W shots in camera, shooting JPG (and very occasionally RAW+JPG for some monos just in case colour worked better). Usually, I wouldn’t ever do a B&W in camera – the greyscale conversions are the least interesting B&W possible – but the Nikon Picture Controls are quite flexible so got some nice contrasty results.

I’ll try and post some of my favourites this week sometime. Thanks for reading!